ThePlatoon.com
December 03, 2008, 01:24:32 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: WELCOME! As you can see we have changed forum systems, for good I hope.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Shop Gallery  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The rising threat of Mother Russia  (Read 10828 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Lostroth
Full Member
***

Rep: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 369
800.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Lostroth


View Profile
« Reply #100 on: July 12, 2008, 04:22:51 AM »

hmmm 80% isn't that great when it comes to stopping missiles, especially if they're mini-nukes.

all it takes is one missile to get through to cripple Israel, or even the US.

damn it really is a scary situation. well here's hoping nothing happens.
Logged

Formerly Known as King Elessar.
achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #101 on: July 12, 2008, 06:16:28 PM »

80% aint worth a damn when u consider that a medium sized nuclear payload has a blast radius if about 100 mi., the bigger guys get up to the size of texas.

*edit* dont quote me on this, i remeber hearing it somewhere but cant find a link now to back up the info *edit*
« Last Edit: July 12, 2008, 06:22:31 PM by achilles118 » Logged

Da Fish
Sr. Member
****

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 874
3164.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Da Fish

View Profile
« Reply #102 on: July 18, 2008, 01:39:17 PM »

And even when you shoot the missile down, you are still going to have a radiological payload to clean up.... effectively turning a aimed nuclear device into a blind falling "dirty bomb".
Logged

Love. Laugh. Cry. Passion. Anger. Life.
RIP Shrapnill
achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #103 on: July 18, 2008, 03:11:32 PM »

that all depends on the type of device and at what point you shoot it down. most devices like that would have a delayed trigger mechanism, prevents your own nuke from going off on your own country. if you knock it down before it is armed then your good, if not.......................................
Logged

SilentEdge
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Rep: 10
Offline Offline

Posts: 780
272.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to SilentEdge
thesilentedge@hotmail.com
View Profile
« Reply #104 on: August 10, 2008, 11:10:07 AM »

<clears throat>

So... MONO, considering you're clairvoyant, any stock picks for me?
« Last Edit: August 10, 2008, 11:14:08 AM by SilentEdge » Logged

MONOLITH
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Rep: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 3177
697.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to MONOLITH

View Profile
« Reply #105 on: August 12, 2008, 01:59:26 AM »

I TOLD YOU SO.

I TOLD YOU SO.

3 YEARS AGO, I TOLD YOU SO.

This is only phase 2 of his plan.

Phase 1 was flying test bombing runs into sovereign airspace of other countries a couple months ago, just in case we reacted to this.
Logged

achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #106 on: August 12, 2008, 04:32:13 AM »

whats phase 3 monstradomas?
Logged

MONOLITH
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Rep: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 3177
697.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to MONOLITH

View Profile
« Reply #107 on: August 12, 2008, 11:50:38 PM »

Wait a few weeks and look out your window.



 grin
Logged

Lostroth
Full Member
***

Rep: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 369
800.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Lostroth


View Profile
« Reply #108 on: August 13, 2008, 12:44:24 AM »

Everyone says Europe will the be the first target for Russia, i believe North America is Russia's first target. We are their biggest threat, once they put extreme pressure on us, whether it's through bombing or invasion, they will strike Europe.

the conflict in Georgia is the light that can ignite the fuse of the biggest shit-bomb the world has ever seen.
Logged

Formerly Known as King Elessar.
achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #109 on: August 13, 2008, 02:56:22 AM »

Quote
Wait a few weeks and look out your window.

sure but it will be out the window of an uparmoured hmmwv, remember my profession.

Quote
Everyone says Europe will the be the first target for Russia, i believe North America is Russia's first target. We are their biggest threat, once they put extreme pressure on us, whether it's through bombing or invasion, they will strike Europe.

the conflict in Georgia is the light that can ignite the fuse of the biggest shit-bomb the world has ever seen.

maybe but its like Hitler said no one will succeed in invading the USA, there are too many guns.
Logged

Fixxxer
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Rep: 6
Online Online

Posts: 2066
3325.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Fixxxer
seanzillakilla@hotmail.com
View Profile
« Reply #110 on: August 13, 2008, 05:28:28 AM »

maybe but its like Hitler said no one will succeed in invading the USA, there are too many guns.

This may be 1 part paranoia and 2 parts frighteningly possible; but if you were Russia in this situation and your target was the USA, would you even consider a military invasion? Or would you look at options that operate on a larger scale? And have quite the access to such things.

That may be going a bit far, and even if that were to happen it could cripple the United States and pretty much destroy it economically. But at that point the US has nearly nothing to lose and those Ohio class subs would likely send hell their way.

It will just be interesting to see if this calms or escalates. I don't know much of Russia's intent really, but considering the somewhat "primitive" nature of an actual "invasion", I'd consider just about anything a possibility at this point.

My $0.02 CAD for what it's worth.

Tongue
« Last Edit: August 13, 2008, 05:35:00 AM by Fixxxer » Logged

58% of all deaths are fatal.
99% of all lawyers ruin it for the rest of them.
achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #111 on: August 13, 2008, 01:02:30 PM »

at the beggining of the Russian invasion of Georgia the Georgian Army launch a mortar attack on a Russian position killing 12 and injuring 150 Russians; this tells me a 1 of a couple of things happened,

a.) disinformation from one side or another creating a desired world political view

b.) Georgians shot a whole hell of alot of mortars covering the target area causing mass cassualties

c.) Georgians have heat seeking mortars

d.) Georgians are snipers with mortars or fired them at point blank range

e.) Russian soldiers suck so much they dont even know how to get out from under falling explosives

my opinion is leaning toward a or e (c and d were meant to be sarcastic and I doubt the Georgian military has the budget to pull off b) either way Russian soldiers dont strike me as overly trained and competent.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2008, 12:21:01 PM by achilles118 » Logged

Lostroth
Full Member
***

Rep: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 369
800.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Lostroth


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: August 14, 2008, 10:56:01 PM »

start re-building those shelters

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7561926.stm

Poland has signed a preliminary deal with the US on plans to host part of the controversial US defence shield.

The proposal is for the US to base 10 missile interceptors in Poland in exchange for help strengthening Polish air defences.
Logged

Formerly Known as King Elessar.
achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #113 on: August 14, 2008, 11:02:34 PM »

shelters aint gonna help you none and duh help them build air defenses;

just like if you can dodge a wrench you can dodge a ball

if you can shoot down a missile you can shoot down a plane!!!
Logged

Da Fish
Sr. Member
****

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 874
3164.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Da Fish

View Profile
« Reply #114 on: August 15, 2008, 05:31:58 PM »

Everyone says Europe will the be the first target for Russia, i believe North America is Russia's first target. We are their biggest threat, once they put extreme pressure on us, whether it's through bombing or invasion, they will strike Europe.

the conflict in Georgia is the light that can ignite the fuse of the biggest shit-bomb the world has ever seen.

I disagree.
europe will be first. Mainly due to the fact that it is easier to invade a country from land than from sea. European nieghbours are most likely to be reliant on Russian energy reserves and more likely to capitulate when the Russians turn off the juice, roll the tanks through and move west. America wont be able to assist its NATO allies due to being over stretched in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Of course Europe needs to start looking into non-russian supplied forms of energy. Im becoming very aware of the russian stranglehold on the gas supplies we get.

You know what?.... bugger it, Im migrating to New Zealand!
Logged

Love. Laugh. Cry. Passion. Anger. Life.
RIP Shrapnill
achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #115 on: August 15, 2008, 05:40:42 PM »

Quote
europe will be first. Mainly due to the fact that it is easier to invade a country from land than from sea. European nieghbours are most likely to be reliant on Russian energy reserves and more likely to capitulate when the Russians turn off the juice, roll the tanks through and move west. America wont be able to assist its NATO allies due to being over stretched in Afghanistan and Iraq.

the governments of both of those countries have a military and police force, we could actually leave those countries tomorrow if we really needed to. I would think that a Russian invasion of europe would find me in Poland quick.

Quote
You know what?.... bugger it, Im migrating to New Zealand!

kind of a shame I had always had a pipe dream of reimmigrating back to Ireland.
Logged

Lostroth
Full Member
***

Rep: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 369
800.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Lostroth


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: August 15, 2008, 09:08:37 PM »

here is why i think Russia will hit the US/Canada first.

if Russia hits Europe first, we will be quick to act, and Russia would not be able to withstand hits from all sides.

if Russia hits North America first, how quick do you think Europe will react, or if they react at all? i for one think they wouldn't help. they would just fortify themselves thinking they can hold out on their own.
Logged

Formerly Known as King Elessar.
achilles118
ft. bragg is gotham and I am batman
Full Member
***

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 233
4610.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to achilles118

rock on


View Profile Email
« Reply #117 on: August 15, 2008, 09:10:35 PM »

here's some more food for thought. If worse comes to worse would europe use nuclear weapons in reaction to russia using them on North America?
Logged

Da Fish
Sr. Member
****

Rep: 5
Offline Offline

Posts: 874
3164.50 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Da Fish

View Profile
« Reply #118 on: August 16, 2008, 01:47:34 AM »

here's some more food for thought. If worse comes to worse would europe use nuclear weapons in reaction to russia using them on North America?
Definately something to chew on....

I think Britain would, but not lightly. (military targets, lower populated areas etc etc)  the further east you would go i think the less likely the europeans would be to using them.

here is why i think Russia will hit the US/Canada first.

if Russia hits Europe first, we will be quick to act, and Russia would not be able to withstand hits from all sides.

if Russia hits North America first, how quick do you think Europe will react, or if they react at all? i for one think they wouldn't help. they would just fortify themselves thinking they can hold out on their own.

I dunno, NATO and the Commonwealth still stand for a lot. Considering most of europe is afraid of the big bear, the opportunity to strike at it with its back turned is extremely tempting. Of course only a idiot would open up a conflict on two fronts so it all depends on how brave/stupid the Russians feel!

Mind you, what is interesting is the fact that the russians have claimed most of the oil under the north pole. I cant see the conflict being fought round the world, but over it.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2008, 01:55:31 AM by Da Fish » Logged

Love. Laugh. Cry. Passion. Anger. Life.
RIP Shrapnill
Lostroth
Full Member
***

Rep: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 369
800.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to Lostroth


View Profile
« Reply #119 on: August 16, 2008, 03:08:37 AM »

honestly, i believe NATO is close to crumbling. depends what happens in Afghanistan. Georgia has been pushing to be accepted into NATO, do you think they want in when the only help they have received so far is some aid from the US, and a lot of empty threats to Russia.

the old NATO would have poured troops, tanks, planes, anything they could into Georgia to protect them from Russia. it would turn into another East/West Germany, with each side waiting for the other to make a move.
Logged

Formerly Known as King Elessar.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
SMF Theme © Gaia
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!