ThePlatoon.com
January 10, 2009, 04:00:34 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: WELCOME! As you can see we have changed forum systems, for good I hope.
 
  Home   Forum   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Shop Gallery  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: "Intel loses market share in own backyard"  (Read 448 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
sithdemon
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Rep: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 685
0.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to sithdemon

View Profile
« on: January 20, 2006, 04:13:07 AM »

http://news.com.com/AMD+market+share+soars+in+PCs/2100-1003_3-6028349.html?part=rss&tag=6028349&subj=news

"Intel lost significant share to Advanced Micro Devices in the U.S. retail market in the fourth quarter, according to figures released Wednesday by Current Analysis.

Intel executives said Tuesday that they expected to lose about one point of market share to AMD during a disappointing fourth quarter. That figure refers to worldwide sales of microprocessors during the quarter, an Intel spokesman confirmed. Among U.S. retail PCs, however, the results were more striking.

Intel's share of the U.S. retail PC market fell by 11 percentage points, from 64.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2004 to 53.3 percent, said Sam Bhavnani, a senior analyst at Current Analysis. Current Analysis' market share numbers measure U.S. retail sales only, and therefore exclude figures from Dell, which uses its Web site to sell directly to consumers. Dell, the top PC vendor in the U.S., exclusively uses Intel's processors in its PCs. (Sales by online retailers were excluded from the market share analysis as well).

Sales of Intel-based desktop PCs fell 22.3 percent during the fourth quarter, according to Current Analysis. As a result, sales of AMD-based desktops took the lead during the pivotal fourth-quarter holiday shopping season. AMD chips were found in 52.5 percent of desktop PCs sold in U.S. retail stores during that period.

Intel partially blamed poor demand for desktops for its fourth-quarter earnings results that were below expectations. But desktop shipments grew 13.4 percent among U.S. retail customers during the quarter, Bhavnani said. Last month, IDC predicted the entire U.S. PC market would grow only 8.3 percent during 2006.

Intel Chief Financial Officer Andy Bryant also noted that Intel's yearlong supply problems with desktop chipsets extended into the fourth quarter, hurting sales of Intel-based desktops and allowing AMD-based systems to make inroads at Intel's expense.

Notebook PCs have been the fastest-growing segment of the PC market for several quarters, and Intel has a sizable advantage over AMD in that segment. But its lead shrank during the fourth quarter as the percentage of AMD-based notebooks increased from 22.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2004 to 30.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2005. Shipments of AMD-based notebooks doubled compared with the previous year, while shipments of Intel-based notebooks increased by 34 percent in the U.S., Bhavnani said.

AMD is expected to report its own fourth-quarter earnings Wednesday afternoon. The results are eagerly awaited by analysts; investors are wondering if Intel's problems are its own, or if the three-year boom in the PC market has finally run its course.

"In posting the weakest Q4 revenue result and Q1 outlook since the bursting of the bubble, Intel has made it clear how much competitive ground the company has lost to AMD. The extent of the losses has exceeded our expectations," Merrill Lynch analyst Joe Osha wrote in a research note on Wednesday.

Intel's stock closed down 11.5 percent, or $2.91, to $22.60 on Wednesday trading on the Nasdaq. AMD's stock ended the day up 1.5 percent, or 51 cents, at $33.37."



Looks like the tiny upstart, that used to have exploding chips, is finally a major competitor, beyond the niche gamer market it's had for a little while. I wonder if those figures include Macs, probably, but would be interesting to know. In any case I hope it'll force Intel to step up it's game, maybe open up the motherboard chipsets a bit, cause AMD is killing them in that deptartment. Anyways go AMD! nothing really against Intels, I had one way back in the day, but one after that it was AMD motherboards, mostly cause it was cheaper.
Logged

MEDIC!!
RedTornado
Full Member
***

Rep: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 101
0.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to RedTornado

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2006, 04:34:31 AM »

Intel just released some new cores (Presler = dual core, CedarMill = single core) which are both performing quite impressively for an initial start considering their overclocking potential. The Prescotts really hurt Intel, so now that they've FINALLY moved on, I think we can expect to see some more from Intel.

Open up their chipsets? Seems like that's all they've been working on lately. Intel's chipsets are very good and the i955x and the brand new i975x run both SLI and Crossfire (SLI is not officially supported, however, because nVIDIA didn't like ATI being included in on the deal).
Logged

Intel Core2Duo E6600 (L630B)
Abit AB9 QuadGT
2GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500
HIS X1900XTX w/ VF900
OCZ GameXStream 700w
CoolerMaster Mystique
sithdemon
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****

Rep: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 685
0.00 credits

View Inventory
Send Money to sithdemon

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2006, 06:19:39 AM »

good to see competition working, it's been working so well in the graphic card area the last few years especially. Heck even the OS market might get shaken up one day. For now I'm glad to hear intel is getting the msg.
Logged

MEDIC!!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
SMF Theme © Gaia
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!